Zack Arias reviews the Fuji X-T1

Zack Arias has long been one of my many photographic idols, and I tend to respect his opinion (for the most part) when it comes to photographic methodology and equipment. He's been publicly using the X-T1 since February, and is just now getting around to publishing his official review. Summary: he loves it.

Conclusion… I have zero regrets about selling all of my Canon gear and going Fuji. Zero regrets.

This is the same photographer who, in his review of my beloved Fuji X100s, declared that Fujifilm is the new Leica.

The X-T1 is high on my wish list, but Fuji likely has something even better in store: the X-100T. Fujirumors posted some interesting and very believable information about it earlier this week.

Modular Scale Design

I was able to implement one of my favorite fonts, Avenir, thanks to's free web font plan. When we switch typefaces, the nature of design almost always calls for tweaks to font sizes, line height, spacing, and all the rest (after all, not all fonts are made the same. 17pt in Museo Sans looks much bigger than 17pt in Avenir.)

When designing on the web, my favorite strategy to implement is using a modular scale, best described in Tim Brown's excellent article on A List Apart called More Meaningful Typography. The idea is to unite our sizing choices with a metric or ratio of choice—in the above article, Tim uses the golden ratio of 1:618.

I like the golden ratio, but it's still a bit arbitrary for me. I chose the musical perfect fifth, based off of the ratio 2:3. This decision was inspired by the primary subject matter of my blog, the photography: most of my images are cropped to a standard 3:2 aspect ratio, so it made sense to me to align the rest of my blog's content along a similar ratio.

The next step is deciding our ideal typeface size. As mentioned before, not every font renders the same at every size. Some fonts look better smaller, some look better larger. To me, the not-so-arbitrary decision was to use Avenir for my body copy and set it at 18pt; not too small, but certainly not too big either.

With these decisions made, we can construct our modular scale using a simple calculator at You can see the scale I ended up using here.

Now, our choices of design metrics don't have to be based on arbitrary numbers or our eye alone. We have mathematics to back up our choices, and if you know me, this is how I like to operate. All sizes, from various font sizes and line heights of headings, captions, etc. were chosen from this scale, as well as widths and spacings. The modular scale design concept leaves enough guess work to fit the eye and creative mind of the designer, while implementing pixel-perfect calculations and ratios to satisfy the more detail-oriented designers.

As with any redesign, it's important to sit on the refreshed look for a couple of days. Allow your visual palette to be cleansed, come back to it, and decide if you still like it. While the modular scale concept seems mathematically sound, the visual arts are rarely perfectly aligned with science. For instance, looking at my design now, I am beginning to feel like the widened content and increased font sizes detract from the emphasized in-your-face photographs. This might call for another look at my choices.

The Brooks Review Podcast with CJ Chilvers

I don't often link to individual podcast episodes (in fact I've only recently begun listening to podcasts more, with the release of Overcast) but episode 4 of Ben Brooks' podcast is worth a listen for anyone interested in photography at all. I'm a huge fan of CJ Chilvers' work, which was originally centered around A Lesser Photographer, a not-so-out-there concept about prioritizing the subject matter and personal meaning of your photographs over the technical been-there-done-that. Ben has been curating some great guests on his podcast, and this has been my favorite yet. Check it out.

Young and Unfit

Writing for The New York Times, Gretchen Reynolds throws a dizzying amount of studies, percentages, and facts proving that America's youth is more out of shape than ever before. Early in the article, aptly titled This is Our Youth, a study hypothesizes that children's physical activity peaks at age 2Excuse me?

A few more takeaway points: most of these statistics hold up regardless of the family’s economic situation; on average, children spend between eight and 10 hours per day in front of a screen, girls are worse off than boys, and this is ultimately a family issue. Get on it, mom and pop. Twelve-year-olds should not be showing symptoms of heart disease.